Jessika Ponchet vs Mei Yamaguchi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Jul at 05:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Ponchet vs M. Yamaguchi

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ponchet 1 - 0 Yamaguchi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jessika Ponchet winning 2 and Mei Yamaguchi winning 0. The last match between Jessika Ponchet and Mei Yamaguchi was at the W75 Lexington, 30-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jessika Ponchet getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ponchet | 1 |
| Yamaguchi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Lexington(07-30-25)
J. Ponchet vs M. Yamaguchi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $600,654 | Career Prize Money | $19,580 |
| 57.67% (391-287) | Career Total W/L | 56.62% (218-167) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 57.14% (4-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (1-1) |
J. Ponchet vs M. Yamaguchi Match Preview:
- Second Serve Analysis: Recently, Ponchet has won 40.65% of points on their second serve, narrowly outperforming Yamaguchi, who stands at 39.53%. Does this slight edge in second serve points indicate a possible advantage for Ponchet? It potentially does, considering the correlation with match outcomes.
- Return Game Comparison: Ponchet excels at returning second serves, winning 51.83% of points, compared to Yamaguchi's 49.34%. However, Yamaguchi's effectiveness against first serves is higher, winning 35.74% of points, while Ponchet manages 24.98%. Might Yamaguchi's proficiency at returning first serves give them an edge? It's a strong possibility.
- Breaking Point Defense: Ponchet has saved 56.42% of breakpoints recently, showcasing better defense under pressure relative to Yamaguchi's 46.9%. Could this superior breakpoint saving ability tilt the match in Ponchet's favor during critical moments? Likely so.
- Overall Match Success: Throughout the past year, Yamaguchi has a superior win rate of 56.41%, compared to Ponchet's 50.88%. Does this general success imply Yamaguchi is the favored contender? It suggests a slight upper hand.
- Surface Effectiveness: Both players show their best performances on hard courts, with Ponchet winning 61% and Yamaguchi 57% of matches on this surface. Their grass court records are less impressive. Is there a significant advantage on a hard court for Ponchet? Marginally, yes.
- Event Level Play: Over the past year, Ponchet has split matches equally at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, whereas Yamaguchi boasts a higher winning percentage of 57.14% at the same level. Does this imply Yamaguchi might handle pressure better in competitive settings? It certainly supports that idea.
- Opponent Quality: Ponchet has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 269.86 compared to Yamaguchi's 344.42. Does playing tougher opponents better prepare Ponchet for challenges? Potentially, yes.
- Deciding Set Performance: If it comes down to a deciding set, Ponchet has a slight edge, winning 41% versus Yamaguchi's 38%, suggesting marginal superiority in clutch situations.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Ponchet converts 40.31% of break opportunities, surpassing Yamaguchi's 38.37%. Could this ability be crucial during key moments of the match? It might be.
Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):
Upon analyzing the data, the head-to-head stats reveal a highly competitive match between Ponchet and Yamaguchi. Ponchet demonstrates marginally better performance in converting second serve points and defending against breakpoints, which can be crucial in tight situations.
Conversely, Yamaguchi presents a solid record in overall matches and displays successful first serve returns and consistency at the Challengers/ITF level. Their slightly better win percentage over the last year and competitive level experience further suggest potential resilience.
Although both competitors show strengths and weaknesses in distinct areas, Ponchet's superior performance in tightly contested scenarios, like breakpoint saving and deciding sets, provides them with a slight edge. Based on these observations, Ponchet is the most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Jessika Ponchet vs Mei Yamaguchi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Ponchet vs M. Yamaguchi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:28:31 | Average Match Time | 1:28:31 |
| 49% (30/61) | 1st Serve % | 65% (45/69) |
| 80% (24/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 45% (31/69) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Ponchet Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | ||
M. Yamaguchi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 5-7 7-5 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 5-7 6-0 1-0 ret. | ||

J. Ponchet vs M. Yamaguchi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.67% (391/287) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.62% (218/167) |
| 57.47% (892/660) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.85% (487/385) |
| 53.27% (7646/6708) | Games Win/Loss | 53.02% (4163/3689) |
| 60.41% (148/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.78% (134/102) |
| 55.91% (104/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.14% (32/25) |
| 57.87% (125/91) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.04% (49/34) |
| 45.16% (14/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 2595 | Aces Total | 285 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1332 | Total Double Faults | 821 |
| 1:17:36 | Average Match Time | 1:20:33 |
| 490.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 464.32 |
| 55% (21146/38416) | 1st Serve % | 66% (13980/21077) |
| 70% (14848/21146) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8155/13980) |
| 45% (7853/17269) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3286/7097) |
| 46% (2000/4347) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1344/2730) |
| 44% (16455/37768) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9718/20506) |
| 34.88% (15/28) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.03% (29/34) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 59.77% (257/173) | Challenger W/L | 55.16% (171/139) |
| 64.49% (89/49) | Futures W/L | 66.10% (39/20) |
| 58% (386/669) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (214/380) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (90/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (29/58) |
| 44% (89/201) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (51/105) |
| 84% (416/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (221/188) |
| 16% (416/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (221/33) |
| 16% (262/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (164/29) |